Virtualization of teaching in design: analysis of an academic exercise focused on an electronic toy

Alejandro Daniel Murga González

doi:10.37636/recit.v5n4e242

Authors

Alejandro Daniel Murga González Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Blvd. Universitario 1000, Tijuana, Baja California, México. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5840-1822

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37636/recit.v5n4e242

Keywords:

Virtualization in education, Design workshop, Interface, Design project, Electronic devices

Abstract

The present work aims to analyze from a pedagogical approach the controversy of the virtualization of teaching in design disciplines based on an academic exercise developed from 2020, the year of the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic; within the framework of several collegiate courses of the Industrial Design educational program, Faculty of Engineering Sciences (FCITEC) of the Autonomous University of Baja California (UABC). For this, recognized authors in the field of pedagogy and its crossover with the discipline of Design are considered; as well as the implementation of concepts such as interface, to give a schematic explanation of the interactive process of teaching and learning and teaching practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. D. Murga González, G. R. Nájera Morga, and C. Caraveo Mena, “Development of interactive gadgets: pedagogical, methodological and ergonomic aspects for industrial design,” REVISTA DE CIENCIAS TECNOLÓGICAS, vol. 4, no. 4. Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingenieria y Tecnologia de la UABC, pp. 412–424, Dec. 16, 2021. doi: 10.37636/recit.v44412424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37636/recit.v44412424

Astolfi, J. P. Vers une pédagogie constructiviste. Se former, 49, 1-36, 1995.

R. Kopytko, “Philosophy and pragmatics: A language-game with Ludwig Wittgenstein,” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 39, no. 5. Elsevier BV, pp. 792–812, May 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.011

Litwin, E. El oficio de enseñar. Condiciones y contextos. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 2008.

Vielma, E. V., & Salas, M. L. Aportes de las teorías de Vygotsky, Piaget, Bandura y Bruner. Paralelismo en sus posiciones en relación con el desarrollo. Educere, 3(9), 30-37, 2000.

Necuzzi, C. Educación, enseñanza y didáctica en la contemporaneidad. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación, 67, 1-5, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi67.1125

Mazzeo, Cecilia (2013) Diseño Gráfico en la Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo, un entramado de herencias y renovaciones. Anales del IAA. Volumen 43 (2), pp. 213-226.

Pérez Marín, M. Ludwik Fleck: precursor del pensamiento de Thomas Kuhn. eidos, (13), 130-149, 2010.

Gibson, J. J. The theory of affordances. Hilldale, USA, 1(2), 67-82, 1977

R. Meyer, “From Artefacts to Interfaces: Gui Bonsiepe and the Redefinition of Industrial Design,” Interface critique, p. Nr. 2 (2019): Navigating the Human, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.11588/IC.2019.2.66996.

D. A. Norman, “Design principles for human-computer interfaces,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’83. ACM Press, 1983. doi: 10.1145/800045.801571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/800045.801571

Norman, D. Affordances and design. Unpublished article, 2004, available online at: http://www. jnd. org/dn. mss/affordances-and-design. Html

D. A. Norman, “Natural user interfaces are not natural,” Interactions, vol. 17, no. 3. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), pp. 6–10, May 2010. doi: 10.1145/1744161.1744163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1744161.1744163

Shotter, J. Vygotsky: The social negotiation of semiotic mediation. New Ideas in Psychology, 11(1), 61-75, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(93)90020-E

J. Ruiz, E. Serral, and M. Snoeck, “Unifying Functional User Interface Design Principles,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 37, no. 1. Informa UK Limited, pp. 47–67, Aug. 26, 2020. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1805876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1805876

Chevallard Y., Joshua M.A. Un exemple d'analyse de la transposition didactique: la notion de distance. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 3, 1, 159-239, 1982.

D'Amore, B., & Fandiño, M. Un acercamiento analítico al" triángulo de la didáctica". Educación matemática, 14(1), 48-61, 2002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24844/EM1401.03

D. E. Kieras and D. E. Meyer, “An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance With Application to Human-Computer Interaction,” Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 12, no. 4. Informa UK Limited, pp. 391–438, Dec. 1997. doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1204_4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1204_4

Moneo, R., Gandelsonas, M. Bohigas, O., Eisenman, P. Piñon, H. Wilder, A. After Modern Architecture. Arquitecturas BIS (nº22), 2-32, 1978.

Corona Martinez, A. Ensayo sobre el Proyecto. Buenos Aires: Editorial CP67, 1990.

T. Miaskiewicz and K. A. Kozar, “Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes?,” Design Studies, vol. 32, no. 5. Elsevier BV, pp. 417–430, Sep. 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003

C. Moser, V. Fuchsberger, K. Neureiter, W. Sellner, and M. Tscheligi, “Revisiting personas,” CHI ’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, May 05, 2012. doi: 10.1145/2212776.2212822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212822

Jordan, P. W. An introduction to usability. CRC Press, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003062769

Kelly, J. F. 3D modeling and printing with tinkercad. Indianapolis, IN: Que Publishing, 2014.