A comparative study of approximations to the RG model in a differential photoacoustic system in reflection mode

Authors

  • Luis David Vargas Sotelo Tecnológico Nacional de México / Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Antonio García Cubas Pte #1200 esq. Ignacio Borunda, C.P. 38010, Celaya, Guanajuato. México https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0301-2178
    Competing Interests

    The author declares no conflicts of interest related to this publication.

  • Sergio Marcial Palma Tecnológico Nacional de México / Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Antonio García Cubas Pte #1200 esq. Ignacio Borunda, C.P. 38010, Celaya, Guanajuato. México https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8577-9081
    Competing Interests

    The author declares no conflicts of interest related to this publication.

  • Salvador Manuel Malagón-Soldara Tecnológico Nacional de México / Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Antonio García Cubas Pte #1200 esq. Ignacio Borunda, C.P. 38010, Celaya, Guanajuato. México https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2486-0892
    Competing Interests
    The author declares no conflicts of interest related to this publication.
  • Francisco Javier García-Rodríguez Tecnológico Nacional de México / Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Antonio García Cubas Pte #1200 esq. Ignacio Borunda, C.P. 38010, Celaya, Guanajuato. México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5342-9052
    Competing Interests

    The author declares no conflicts of interest related to this publication.

  • David Gasca-Figueroa Tecnológico Nacional de México / Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Antonio García Cubas Pte #1200 esq. Ignacio Borunda, C.P. 38010, Celaya, Guanajuato. México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8113-7935
    Competing Interests
    The author declares no conflicts of interest related to this publication.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37636/recit.v9n3e478

Keywords:

Thermal effusivity, Photocoustic response, Approximations of complex relative pressure, Differential photoacoustic cell

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of approximations to the photoacoustic response obtained from the Rosencwaig-Gersho (RG) model for a differential photoacoustic cell in reflection mode, and in this way to evaluate its use in determining thermal effusivity. An integrated configuration consisting of two identical conventional photoacoustic cells is proposed, in which the ratio of the photoacoustic responses allows a reduction in the number of geometric, optical, and thermal parameters, simplifying the mathematical treatment. Zero-order, first-order, and second-order approximations are developed for the ratio of complex relative pressures, and their performance is evaluated by the percentage error with respect to the complete expression of the RG model. The analysis is performed for modulation frequencies between 1 and 2000 Hz, using air as the working gas and aluminum as the thermal transducer in both cells, and, in one cell, steel is used as support material and as a reference, while in the other cell, thermal effusivities between 5.85 and 36500 Wꞏs1/2ꞏm-2ꞏK-1 are worked on in the support material under study. The results show that the zero-order approximation exhibits significant deviations, while the first-order approximation offers an optimal balance between simplicity and accuracy, making it the most suitable for describing the photoacoustic response of the differential system. The proposed method constitutes a non-intrusive, reproducible, and low-cost alternative for the thermal characterization of materials, with potential applications in liquid systems, cooling processes, biomaterials, and various engineering fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] L. Mota, R. Toledo, F. Machado, J. Holanda, H. Vargas, and R. Faria, “Thermal characterization of red clay from the Northern Region of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil using an open photoacoustic cell, in relation to structural changes on firing,” Appl. Clay Sci., vol. 42, no. 1–2, pp. 168–174, Dec. 2008.

[2] T. A. El-Brolossy and S. S. Ibrahim, “Photoacoustic measurement of thermal properties of polystyrene metal oxide composites,” Thermochim. Acta, vol. 509, no. 1–2, pp. 46–49, Oct. 2010.

[3] M. Sarkar and K. Kumar, “Fabrication of photoacoustic cell and thermal diffusivity measurement of coal carbon black using it,” Mater. Today: Proc., Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.467.

[4] A. Bedoya, E. Marín, M. Mansanares, M. A. Zambrano-Arjona, I. Riech, and A. Calderón, “On the thermal characterization of solids by photoacoustic calorimetry: thermal diffusivity and linear thermal expansion coefficient,” Thermochim. Acta, vol. 614, pp. 52–58, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2015.06.009.

[5] K. Herrmann, W. Pech-May, and M. Retsch, “Photoacoustic thermal characterization of low thermal diffusivity thin films,” Photoacoustics, vol. 22, p. 100246, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100246.

[6] F. Agresti et al., “Temperature controlled photoacoustic device for thermal diffusivity measurements of liquids and nanofluids,” Thermochim. Acta, vol. 619, pp. 48–52, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2015.09.017.

[7] J. Soldner and K. Stephan, “Measurement of thermal diffusivities with the photoacoustic effect,” Chem. Eng. Process.: Process Intensif., vol. 38, no. 4–6, pp. 585–591, Dec. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0255-2701(99)00056-2.

[8] G. A. López-Muñoz, R. F. López-González, J. A. Balderas-López, and L. Martínez-Pérez, “Thermal-diffusivity measurements of Mexican citrus essential oils using photoacoustic methodology in the transmission configuration,” Int. J. Thermophys., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1006–1012, May 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10765-011-0983-1.

[9] D. Soares-Velasco, M. Luciano-Baesso, A. Neto-Medina, D. Danijel-Bicanic, and R. Koehorst, “Thermal diffusivity of periderm from tomatoes of different maturity stages as determined by the concept of the frequency-domain open photoacoustic cell,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 109, no. 3, p. 034703, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1063/1.3530735.

[10] C. M. Gao, S. Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang, and X. J. Shui, “Thermal diffusivity of porcine tissues characterized by photoacoustic piezoelectric technique,” J. Phys. IV France, vol. 125, pp. 777–779, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1051/jp4:2005125179.

[11] F. B. G. Astrath, N. G. C. Astrath, M. L. Baesso, A. C. Bento, and J. C. S. Moraes, “Open photoacoustic cell for thermal diffusivity measurements of a fast hardening cement used in dental restoring,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 111, no. 1, p. 014701, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1063/1.3673873.

[12] A. Rosencwaig and A. Gersho, “Theory of the photoacoustic effect with solids,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 64–69, Jan. 1976, doi: 10.1063/1.322296.

[13] J. Pelzl, S. Chotikaprakhan, Dietzel D, B. K. Bein, E. Neubauer, and M. Chirtoc, “The thermal contact problem in nano- and micro-scale photothermal measurements,” Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top., vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 335–342, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2008-00457-9.

[14] M. Manivannan, S. Balachandar, M. Jose, S. A. Martin Britto Dhas, and A. Saranraj, “Investigation on thermo-physical properties of L-valinium picrate single crystal for industrial applications,” Mater. Lett. X, vol. 12, p. 100108, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.mlblux.2021.100108.

[15] M. G. Fernández-Olaya, "Análisis por medio de ondas térmicas de películas poliméricas delgadas y determinación de las propiedades ópticas, térmicas y eléctricas de óxidos de titanio (Ti2O3 y TiO2)," Tesis doctoral, Dept. Física Aplicada, CINVESTAV Unidad Mérida, Mérida, México, 2023.

[16] C. Hernandez-Aguilar et al., “Photoacoustic characterization of wheat bread mixed with Moringa oleífera,” Curr. Res. Food Sci., vol. 4, pp. 521–531, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.07.008.

[17] H. S. Bennett and R. A. Forman, “Frequency dependence of photoacoustic spectroscopy: Surface and bulk absorption coefficients,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1432–1436, Apr. 1977, doi: 10.1063/1.323815.

[18] D. Cahen, “Photoacoustic cell for reflection and transmission measurements,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1306–1310, Sep. 1981, doi: 10.1063/1.1136780.

[19] F. G. C. Bijnen, J. Reuss, and F. J. M. Harren, “Geometrical optimization of a longitudinal resonant photoacoustic cell for sensitive and fast trace gas detection,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 2914–2923, Aug. 1996, doi: 10.1063/1.1147124.

[20] D. I. Kovsh, D. J. Hagan, and E. W. Van Stryland, “Numerical modeling of thermal refraction in liquids in the transient regime,” Opt. Express, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 315–329, Apr. 1999, doi: 10.1364/OE.4.000315.

[21] M. Nägele and M. W. Sigrist, “Mobile laser spectrometer with novel resonant multipass photoacoustic cell for trace-gas sensing,” Appl. Phys. B, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 895–901, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1007/s003400000251.

[22] L. C. Aamodt, J. C. Murphy, and J. G. Parker, “Size considerations in the design of cells for photoacoustic spectroscopy,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 927–933, Mar. 1977, doi: 10.1063/1.323719.

[23] L. C. Aamodt and J. C. Murphy, “Size considerations in the design of cells for photoacoustic spectroscopy. II. Pulsed excitation response,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 3036–3045, Jun. 1978, doi: 10.1063/1.325299.

[24] F. A. McDonald and G. C. Wetsel, “Generalized theory of the photoacoustic effect,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 2313–2322, Apr. 1978, doi: 10.1063/1.325116.

[25] C. L. Cesar, H. Vargas, J. A. Meyer, and L. C. M. Miranda, “Photoacoustic effect in solids,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 42, no. 23, pp. 1570–1573, Jun. 1979, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1570.

[26] R. S. Quimby and W. M. Yen, “On the adequacy of one‐dimensional treatments of the photoacoustic effect,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 1252–1253, Feb. 1980, doi: 10.1063/1.327668.

[27] N. C. Fernelius, “Extension of the Rosencwaig‐Gersho photoacoustic spectroscopy theory to include effects of a sample coating,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 650–654, Jan. 1980, doi: 10.1063/1.327318.

[28] P. Poulet, J. Chambron, and R. Unterreiner, “Quantitative photoacoustic spectroscopy applied to thermally thick samples,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1738–1742, Mar. 1980, doi: 10.1063/1.327814.

[29] G. Rousset, F. Lepoutre, and L. Bertrand, “Influence of thermoelastic bending on photoacoustic experiments related to measurements of thermal diffusivity of metals,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 2383–2391, May 1983, doi: 10.1063/1.332352.

[30] A. Somer et al., “The thermoelastic bending and thermal diffusion processes influence on photoacoustic signal generation using open photoacoustic cell technique,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 114, no. 6, p. 063503, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4817916.

[31] A. Bedoya et al., “On the thermal characterization of solids by photoacoustic calorimetry: thermal diffusivity and linear thermal expansion coefficient,” Thermochim. Acta, vol. 614, pp. 52–58, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2015.06.009.

[32] M. E. Rodríguez-García et al., “Differential photoacoustic cell for electrochemical and dynamic process with temperature control,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 78, no. 3, p. 034904, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1063/1.2712790.

[33] T. Starecki and A. Geras, “Investigation of Properties of a Microfluidic Photoacoustic Cell,” Int. J. Thermophys., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2259–2266, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10765-014-1715-4.

[34] M. E. Rodríguez-García, R. Velásquez-Hernández, M. L. Mendoza-López, D. M. Hurtado-Castañeda, K. M. Brieño-Enríquez, y J. J. Pérez-Bueno, “Differential Photoacoustic Cell for Electrochemical and Dynamic Process with Temperature Control,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 78, no. 3, p. 034904, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1063/1.2712790.

[35] E. Gutiérrez-Cortez et al., “Effect of processing temperature on structural and physicochemical properties of corn tortillas mixed with several nixtamalized corn flours,” J. Cereal Sci., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 81–86, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.10.003.

Distribution of the percentage error obtained by replacing the complete expression of the ratio of complex relative pressures, c_prc, with the approximations of a) zero order, c_(prc_0 ), b) first order, c_(prc_1 ) and c) second order, c_(prc_2 ), of the Rosencwaig-Gersho model. The horizontal axis represents the light modulation frequency (1–2000 Hz), while the vertical axis corresponds to the thermal effusiveness of the material under study (5.85–36500 W·s¹K²·m⁻²·K⁻¹). The color scale indicates the percentage error with respect to the complete solution.

Published

2026-07-23

Data Availability Statement

Se puede contactar directamente al Contacto principal

How to Cite

Vargas Sotelo, L. D. ., Marcial Palma, S., Malagón-Soldara, S. M., García-Rodríguez, F. J., & Gasca-Figueroa, D. (2026). A comparative study of approximations to the RG model in a differential photoacoustic system in reflection mode. Revista De Ciencias Tecnológicas, 9(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.37636/recit.v9n3e478

Similar Articles

1-10 of 36

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)