An evaluation case for a research seminar


  • Roberto Javier Guerrero-Moreno Faculty of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Autonomous University of Baja California, Blvd. Universitario 1000, Valle de las Palmas, Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico.
  • Eilen Oviedo González National Pedagogical University, Paseo de la Vida s / n, Fraccionamiento Las Américas., Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico.
  • David Abdél Mejía Medina Faculty of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Autonomous University of Baja California, Blvd. Universitario 1000, Valle de las Palmas, Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico.



Education, scientific research.


The research seminar is a staple in many colleges and typically serves as a link between the researchers' work and the student body. However, more than an outreach activity, we believe that it is an excellent means of motivation, and an effort is rarely made to quantify the success of the program in terms of acceptance within the student body. In the following article we will present the results of a 4-year survey in a multidisciplinary engineering / design / architecture school for a state public university in Mexico. The survey was designed with the intention of quantifying the success of the activity in capturing the attention and interest of the students.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Eilen Oviedo González, National Pedagogical University, Paseo de la Vida s / n, Fraccionamiento Las Américas., Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico.

She is a Doctor in Educational Management and Policy, Member of the National System of Researchers (SNI) Level 1. She has a Master's Degree in Education with a specialty in Teacher Training, a specialist in the area of Competencies and Evaluator since 2010 of Teaching Skills at the level Middle Superior. Author of 18 refereed and indexed articles, as well as participation in the publication as an author in 4 books. The leader of the Academic Body: Policies, training, and Evaluation of School Centers. Member of the academic body: Motivation to self-learning. Regional Academic Coordinator of the Ph.D. in Educational Development, Noroeste Chapter, at the National Pedagogical University. He is an arbitrator of some national and international journals in the educational area. Belongs to the Network of Researchers of Chihuahua (REDIECH), as well as the Network of Capacities and Regional Development of the College of the Northern Border (RSTA) and is a Member of the Mexican Council of Educational Research (COMIE), of the Mexican Society of Comparative Education (SOMEC).


R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, Jan. 2012. DOI:

N. Fang, “Correlation between students’ motivated strategies for learning and academic achievement in an engineering dynamics course,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2014.

K. A. Wingate, A. A. Ferri, and K. M. Feigh, “The impact of the physics, statics, and mechanics sequence on student retention and performance in mechanical engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2018-June, 2018.

R. Suresh, “The Relationship Between Barrier Courses and Persistence in Engineering, J Coll Stud Ret. 8(2), 215 – 239, 2006. DOI:

J. C. Hermanowicz, “The College Departure Process among the Academic Elite,” Educ. Urban Soc., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 74–93, Nov. 2004. DOI:

M. G. Wintre, C. Bowers, N. Gordner, and L. Lange, “Re-Evaluating the University Attrition Statistic: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study,” J. Adolesc. Res., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 111–132, Mar. 2006. DOI:

M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman, and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 139–149, Apr. 1997. DOI:

G. Zhang, T. J. Anderson, M. W. Ohland, and B. R. Thorndyke, “Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross-Institutional Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 313–320, Oct. 2004. DOI:

J. P. Del Rio Arteaga, “Modelo Predictivo para la Retención de Estudiantes en Primeros Años,” Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, 2018.

M. Hoit and M. Ohland, “The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 79–85, Jan. 1998. DOI:

B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2013.

M. H. Stohs and J. G. Schutte, “The Graduation Rate Myth and the Equity Gap,” J. Appl. Soc. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 94–114, Sep. 2019. DOI:

D. Yomtov, S. W. Plunkett, R. Efrat, and A. G. Marin, “Can Peer Mentors Improve First-Year Experiences of University Students?,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 25–44, Oct. 2015. DOI:

K. G. Ricks, J. A. Richardson, H. P. Stern, R. P. Taylor, and R. A. Taylor, “An Engineering Learning Community to Promote Retention And Graduation Of At-Risk Engineering Students”, AJEE, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 73-90, Nov. 2014. DOI:

X. Jiang and S. Freeman, “ASQ Advancing the STEM Agenda in Education, the Workplace and Society Session 3-4 An Analysis of the Effect of Cognitive Factors on Students’ Attritions in Engineering: A Literature Review,” pp. 1–12.

J. L. Jensen, S. Neeley, J. B. Hatch, and T. Piorczynski, “Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills May Be Key to Retention in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 126–144, Oct. 2015. DOI:

R. Stanley, “A way to increase the engineering student’s qualitative understanding of particle kinematics and kinetics by utilizing interactive web based animation software,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2009.

J. Malm, L. Bryngfors, and J. Fredriksson, “Impact of Supplemental Instruction on Dropout and Graduation Rates: An Example from 5-Year Engineering Programs.,” J. Peer Learn., vol. 11, pp. 76–88, 2018.

V. M. Lechuga, “A motivation perspective on faculty mentoring: the notion of ‘non-intrusive’ mentoring practices in science and engineering,” High. Educ., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 909–926, 2014. DOI:

P. L. Hardré, and Z. Siddique, “SUCCESS in Engineering Education: Applying an ID Motivational Framework to Promote Engagement and Innovation”. J. Appl. Instr. Des., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 7 – 20, 2013.

A. R. Anggraini and J. Oliver, “Effects of Motivational Beliefs and Instructional Practice on Students’ Intention to Pursue Majors and Careers in Engineering,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2019.

J. M. Good, G. Halpin, and G. Halpin, “A Promising Prospect for Minority Retention: Students Becoming Peer Mentors,” J. Negro Educ., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 375–383, 2000. DOI:

V. a Lotkowski, S. B. Robbins, and R. J. Noeth, “The Role of Academic and Non-Academic Factors in Improving College Retention,” Office, no. September 12, 2007, pp. 1–31, 2004. DOI:

L. Angelino, F. Keels Williams, and D. Natvig, “Strategies to Engage Online Students and Reduce Attrition Rates,” J. Educ. Online, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2007. DOI:

S. E. Martin III and B. Littlepage, “Engineering Retention: Improving Inclusion and Diversity in Engineering,” ProQuest Diss. Theses, p. 172, 2018.

S. Oliveira, “Persistence in aerospace engineering: Why students choose and leave aerospace engineering,” Iowa State University, 2019.

L. Paura and I. Arhipova, “Student dropout rate in engineering education study program,” Eng. Rural Dev., vol. 2016-January, pp. 641–646, 2016.

K. Lenn and J. J. Potoff, “Work-in-Progress-Eos: A comprehensive approach to the retention of first and second year engineering students,” in First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, 2016, pp. 2–4.

M. R. Spiegel, J. Schiller, and S. R. Alu., Probability and Statistic, no. 1. McGraw Hill Mexico, 2013.

T. Yamane, Statistics. An introductory analysis. Third edition. Harper & Row, 1973.

L. J. Cronbach, “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests,” Psychometrika, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297–334, 1951. DOI:

M. Tavakol and R. Dennick, “Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha,” Int J Med Educ, vol. 2, pp. 53–55, Jun. 2011. DOI:

J. M. Cortina, “What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications”. J Appl Psychol. Vol. 78, no. 1. Pp. 98 – 104, 1993. DOI:

T. Raykov and G. A. Marcoulides, “Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We Still Need You!,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 200–210, Aug. 2017. DOI:

E. Cho and S. Kim, “Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha: Well Known but Poorly Understood,” Organ. Res. Methods, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 207–230, Nov. 2014. DOI:

Ways the audience learned of a talk.



How to Cite

Guerrero-Moreno, R. J., Oviedo González, E., & Mejía Medina, D. A. (2020). An evaluation case for a research seminar. REVISTA DE CIENCIAS TECNOLÓGICAS, 3(3), 134–144.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)