An evaluation case for a research seminar
Keywords:Education, scientific research.
AbstractThe research seminar is a staple in many colleges and typically serves as a link between the researchers' work and the student body. However, more than an outreach activity, we believe that it is an excellent means of motivation, and an effort is rarely made to quantify the success of the program in terms of acceptance within the student body. In the following article we will present the results of a 4-year survey in a multidisciplinary engineering / design / architecture school for a state public university in Mexico. The survey was designed with the intention of quantifying the success of the activity in capturing the attention and interest of the students.
R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, Jan. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x
N. Fang, “Correlation between students’ motivated strategies for learning and academic achievement in an engineering dynamics course,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2014. http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/GJEE/Publish/vol16no1/01-Fang-N.pdf
K. A. Wingate, A. A. Ferri, and K. M. Feigh, “The impact of the physics, statics, and mechanics sequence on student retention and performance in mechanical engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2018-June, 2018. https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/106/papers/21647/view
R. Suresh, “The Relationship Between Barrier Courses and Persistence in Engineering, J Coll Stud Ret. 8(2), 215 – 239, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2190/3QTU-6EEL-HQHF-XYF0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/3QTU-6EEL-HQHF-XYF0
J. C. Hermanowicz, “The College Departure Process among the Academic Elite,” Educ. Urban Soc., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 74–93, Nov. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124504268069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124504268069
M. G. Wintre, C. Bowers, N. Gordner, and L. Lange, “Re-Evaluating the University Attrition Statistic: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study,” J. Adolesc. Res., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 111–132, Mar. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558405285658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558405285658
M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman, and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 139–149, Apr. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00277.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00277.x
G. Zhang, T. J. Anderson, M. W. Ohland, and B. R. Thorndyke, “Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross-Institutional Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 313–320, Oct. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00820.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00820.x
J. P. Del Rio Arteaga, “Modelo Predictivo para la Retención de Estudiantes en Primeros Años,” Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11673/41319
M. Hoit and M. Ohland, “The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 79–85, Jan. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00935.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00325.x
B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2013. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/607/
M. H. Stohs and J. G. Schutte, “The Graduation Rate Myth and the Equity Gap,” J. Appl. Soc. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 94–114, Sep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1936724419876677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1936724419876677
D. Yomtov, S. W. Plunkett, R. Efrat, and A. G. Marin, “Can Peer Mentors Improve First-Year Experiences of University Students?,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 25–44, Oct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611398
K. G. Ricks, J. A. Richardson, H. P. Stern, R. P. Taylor, and R. A. Taylor, “An Engineering Learning Community to Promote Retention And Graduation Of At-Risk Engineering Students”, AJEE, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 73-90, Nov. 2014. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajee.v5i2.8953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/ajee.v5i2.8953
X. Jiang and S. Freeman, “ASQ Advancing the STEM Agenda in Education, the Workplace and Society Session 3-4 An Analysis of the Effect of Cognitive Factors on Students’ Attritions in Engineering: A Literature Review,” pp. 1–12. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fe44/b5551f7e22bd2535da690dd62f452ccd78b9.pdf
J. L. Jensen, S. Neeley, J. B. Hatch, and T. Piorczynski, “Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills May Be Key to Retention in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 126–144, Oct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611616
R. Stanley, “A way to increase the engineering student’s qualitative understanding of particle kinematics and kinetics by utilizing interactive web based animation software,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2009. https://peer.asee.org/a-way-to-increase-the-engineering-student-s-qualitative-understanding-of-particle-kinematics-and-kinetics-by-utilizing-interactive-web-based-animation-software.pdf
J. Malm, L. Bryngfors, and J. Fredriksson, “Impact of Supplemental Instruction on Dropout and Graduation Rates: An Example from 5-Year Engineering Programs.,” J. Peer Learn., vol. 11, pp. 76–88, 2018. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol11/iss1/6
V. M. Lechuga, “A motivation perspective on faculty mentoring: the notion of ‘non-intrusive’ mentoring practices in science and engineering,” High. Educ., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 909–926, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9751-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9751-z
P. L. Hardré, and Z. Siddique, “SUCCESS in Engineering Education: Applying an ID Motivational Framework to Promote Engagement and Innovation”. J. Appl. Instr. Des., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 7 – 20, 2013. https://253f0a53-bb62-46af-b495-b4548f4d5d90.filesusr.com/ugd/c9b0ce_6a2616612c994ef796f47b5b1b60fb01.pdf
A. R. Anggraini and J. Oliver, “Effects of Motivational Beliefs and Instructional Practice on Students’ Intention to Pursue Majors and Careers in Engineering,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effects-of-Motivational-Beliefs-and-Instructional-Tendhar/8655b79efe83d52c853f2fb9e2d0067fb061faf4
J. M. Good, G. Halpin, and G. Halpin, “A Promising Prospect for Minority Retention: Students Becoming Peer Mentors,” J. Negro Educ., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 375–383, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2696252
V. a Lotkowski, S. B. Robbins, and R. J. Noeth, “The Role of Academic and Non-Academic Factors in Improving College Retention,” Office, no. September 12, 2007, pp. 1–31, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/e420492008-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e420492008-001
L. Angelino, F. Keels Williams, and D. Natvig, “Strategies to Engage Online Students and Reduce Attrition Rates,” J. Educ. Online, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2007. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2007.2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2007.2.1
S. E. Martin III and B. Littlepage, “Engineering Retention: Improving Inclusion and Diversity in Engineering,” ProQuest Diss. Theses, p. 172, 2018. https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/etd/105/
S. Oliveira, “Persistence in aerospace engineering: Why students choose and leave aerospace engineering,” Iowa State University, 2019. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/17532
L. Paura and I. Arhipova, “Student dropout rate in engineering education study program,” Eng. Rural Dev., vol. 2016-January, pp. 641–646, 2016. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=LV2016030513
K. Lenn and J. J. Potoff, “Work-in-Progress-Eos: A comprehensive approach to the retention of first and second year engineering students,” in First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, 2016, pp. 2–4. http://fyee.asee.org/FYEE2016/papers/155.pdf
M. R. Spiegel, J. Schiller, and S. R. Alu., Probability and Statistic, no. 1. McGraw Hill Mexico, 2013. https://doi.org/10.16309/j.cnki.issn.1007-1776.2003.03.004
T. Yamane, Statistics. An introductory analysis. Third edition. Harper & Row, 1973. https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Statistics_An_introductory_analysis_Thir.html?id=sl75MgEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
J. M. Cortina, “What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications”. J Appl Psychol. Vol. 78, no. 1. Pp. 98 – 104, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
T. Raykov and G. A. Marcoulides, “Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We Still Need You!,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 200–210, Aug. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417725127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417725127
E. Cho and S. Kim, “Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha: Well Known but Poorly Understood,” Organ. Res. Methods, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 207–230, Nov. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Guerrero-Moreno Roberto Javier, Oviedo González Eilen, Mejía-Medina David Abdel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
The authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work it was first published in this magazine.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to share their work online (for example: in institutional repositories or personal web pages) before and during the manuscript submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, greater and more quick citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).