Un caso de evaluación para un seminario de investigación

Roberto Javier Guerrero-Moreno; Eilen Oviedo González; David Abdél Mejía Medina

doi:10.37636/recit.v33134144

Autores/as

Roberto Javier Guerrero-Moreno Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Blvd Universitario 1000, Unidad Valle de Las Palmas, 22260 Tijuana, Baja California, México. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8974-0990
Eilen Oviedo González Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Paseo de la Vida s/n, Fraccionamiento Las Americas., Tijuana, Baja California, México. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-5015
David Abdél Mejía Medina Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Blvd Universitario 1000, Unidad Valle de Las Palmas, 22260 Tijuana, Baja California, México. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2860-2428

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37636/recit.v33134144

Palabras clave:

Educación, investigación científica.

Resumen

El seminario de investigación es un elemento básico en muchas escuelas de educación superior y normalmente sirve como enlace entre el trabajo de los investigadores y el cuerpo estudiantil. Sin embargo, más que una actividad de divulgación, creemos que es un excelente medio de motivación, y rara vez se hace un esfuerzo por cuantificar el éxito del programa en lo que se refiere a la aceptación dentro del alumnado. En el siguiente artículo presentaremos los resultados de una encuesta de 4 años en una escuela multidisciplinaria de ingeniería / diseño / arquitectura para una universidad pública estatal en México. La encuesta fue diseñada con la intención de cuantificar el éxito de la actividad en captar la atención e interés de los estudiantes.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Eilen Oviedo González, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Paseo de la Vida s/n, Fraccionamiento Las Americas., Tijuana, Baja California, México.

She is a Doctor in Educational Management and Policy, Member of the National System of Researchers (SNI) Level 1. She has a Master's Degree in Education with a specialty in Teacher Training, a specialist in the area of Competencies and Evaluator since 2010 of Teaching Skills at the level Middle Superior. Author of 18 refereed and indexed articles, as well as participation in the publication as an author in 4 books. The leader of the Academic Body: Policies, training, and Evaluation of School Centers. Member of the academic body: Motivation to self-learning. Regional Academic Coordinator of the Ph.D. in Educational Development, Noroeste Chapter, at the National Pedagogical University. He is an arbitrator of some national and international journals in the educational area. Belongs to the Network of Researchers of Chihuahua (REDIECH), as well as the Network of Capacities and Regional Development of the College of the Northern Border (RSTA) and is a Member of the Mexican Council of Educational Research (COMIE), of the Mexican Society of Comparative Education (SOMEC).

Citas

R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, Jan. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x

N. Fang, “Correlation between students’ motivated strategies for learning and academic achievement in an engineering dynamics course,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2014. http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/GJEE/Publish/vol16no1/01-Fang-N.pdf

K. A. Wingate, A. A. Ferri, and K. M. Feigh, “The impact of the physics, statics, and mechanics sequence on student retention and performance in mechanical engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2018-June, 2018. https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/106/papers/21647/view

R. Suresh, “The Relationship Between Barrier Courses and Persistence in Engineering, J Coll Stud Ret. 8(2), 215 – 239, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2190/3QTU-6EEL-HQHF-XYF0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/3QTU-6EEL-HQHF-XYF0

J. C. Hermanowicz, “The College Departure Process among the Academic Elite,” Educ. Urban Soc., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 74–93, Nov. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124504268069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124504268069

M. G. Wintre, C. Bowers, N. Gordner, and L. Lange, “Re-Evaluating the University Attrition Statistic: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study,” J. Adolesc. Res., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 111–132, Mar. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558405285658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558405285658

M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman, and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 139–149, Apr. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00277.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00277.x

G. Zhang, T. J. Anderson, M. W. Ohland, and B. R. Thorndyke, “Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross-Institutional Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 313–320, Oct. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00820.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00820.x

J. P. Del Rio Arteaga, “Modelo Predictivo para la Retención de Estudiantes en Primeros Años,” Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11673/41319

M. Hoit and M. Ohland, “The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 79–85, Jan. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00935.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00325.x

B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2013. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/607/

M. H. Stohs and J. G. Schutte, “The Graduation Rate Myth and the Equity Gap,” J. Appl. Soc. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 94–114, Sep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1936724419876677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1936724419876677

D. Yomtov, S. W. Plunkett, R. Efrat, and A. G. Marin, “Can Peer Mentors Improve First-Year Experiences of University Students?,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 25–44, Oct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611398

K. G. Ricks, J. A. Richardson, H. P. Stern, R. P. Taylor, and R. A. Taylor, “An Engineering Learning Community to Promote Retention And Graduation Of At-Risk Engineering Students”, AJEE, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 73-90, Nov. 2014. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajee.v5i2.8953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/ajee.v5i2.8953

X. Jiang and S. Freeman, “ASQ Advancing the STEM Agenda in Education, the Workplace and Society Session 3-4 An Analysis of the Effect of Cognitive Factors on Students’ Attritions in Engineering: A Literature Review,” pp. 1–12. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fe44/b5551f7e22bd2535da690dd62f452ccd78b9.pdf

J. L. Jensen, S. Neeley, J. B. Hatch, and T. Piorczynski, “Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills May Be Key to Retention in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 126–144, Oct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611616

R. Stanley, “A way to increase the engineering student’s qualitative understanding of particle kinematics and kinetics by utilizing interactive web based animation software,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2009. https://peer.asee.org/a-way-to-increase-the-engineering-student-s-qualitative-understanding-of-particle-kinematics-and-kinetics-by-utilizing-interactive-web-based-animation-software.pdf

J. Malm, L. Bryngfors, and J. Fredriksson, “Impact of Supplemental Instruction on Dropout and Graduation Rates: An Example from 5-Year Engineering Programs.,” J. Peer Learn., vol. 11, pp. 76–88, 2018. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol11/iss1/6

V. M. Lechuga, “A motivation perspective on faculty mentoring: the notion of ‘non-intrusive’ mentoring practices in science and engineering,” High. Educ., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 909–926, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9751-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9751-z

P. L. Hardré, and Z. Siddique, “SUCCESS in Engineering Education: Applying an ID Motivational Framework to Promote Engagement and Innovation”. J. Appl. Instr. Des., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 7 – 20, 2013. https://253f0a53-bb62-46af-b495-b4548f4d5d90.filesusr.com/ugd/c9b0ce_6a2616612c994ef796f47b5b1b60fb01.pdf

A. R. Anggraini and J. Oliver, “Effects of Motivational Beliefs and Instructional Practice on Students’ Intention to Pursue Majors and Careers in Engineering,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effects-of-Motivational-Beliefs-and-Instructional-Tendhar/8655b79efe83d52c853f2fb9e2d0067fb061faf4

J. M. Good, G. Halpin, and G. Halpin, “A Promising Prospect for Minority Retention: Students Becoming Peer Mentors,” J. Negro Educ., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 375–383, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2696252

V. a Lotkowski, S. B. Robbins, and R. J. Noeth, “The Role of Academic and Non-Academic Factors in Improving College Retention,” Office, no. September 12, 2007, pp. 1–31, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/e420492008-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e420492008-001

L. Angelino, F. Keels Williams, and D. Natvig, “Strategies to Engage Online Students and Reduce Attrition Rates,” J. Educ. Online, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2007. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2007.2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2007.2.1

S. E. Martin III and B. Littlepage, “Engineering Retention: Improving Inclusion and Diversity in Engineering,” ProQuest Diss. Theses, p. 172, 2018. https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/etd/105/

S. Oliveira, “Persistence in aerospace engineering: Why students choose and leave aerospace engineering,” Iowa State University, 2019. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/17532

L. Paura and I. Arhipova, “Student dropout rate in engineering education study program,” Eng. Rural Dev., vol. 2016-January, pp. 641–646, 2016. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=LV2016030513

K. Lenn and J. J. Potoff, “Work-in-Progress-Eos: A comprehensive approach to the retention of first and second year engineering students,” in First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, 2016, pp. 2–4. http://fyee.asee.org/FYEE2016/papers/155.pdf

M. R. Spiegel, J. Schiller, and S. R. Alu., Probability and Statistic, no. 1. McGraw Hill Mexico, 2013. https://doi.org/10.16309/j.cnki.issn.1007-1776.2003.03.004

T. Yamane, Statistics. An introductory analysis. Third edition. Harper & Row, 1973. https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Statistics_An_introductory_analysis_Thir.html?id=sl75MgEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

L. J. Cronbach, “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests,” Psychometrika, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297–334, 1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

M. Tavakol and R. Dennick, “Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha,” Int J Med Educ, vol. 2, pp. 53–55, Jun. 2011. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd DOI: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

J. M. Cortina, “What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications”. J Appl Psychol. Vol. 78, no. 1. Pp. 98 – 104, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

T. Raykov and G. A. Marcoulides, “Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We Still Need You!,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 200–210, Aug. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417725127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417725127

E. Cho and S. Kim, “Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha: Well Known but Poorly Understood,” Organ. Res. Methods, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 207–230, Nov. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994