Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 3 (1): 10-22

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Universidad Autónoma de Baja California ISSN 2594-1925

Volumen 9 (3): e462. Julio-Septiembre, 2026. https://doi.org/10.37636/recit.v9n3e462

1 ISSN: 2594-1925

Case studies

C-Waste: Environmental education for sustainable

development in urban communities

C-Waste: educación ambiental para el desarrollo sustentable en

comunidades urbanas

Edgar Armando Chávez Moreno1, María Virginia Flores-Ortiz2

1Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Blvd. Universitario 1000,

Unidad Valle de Las Palmas, 22260 Tijuana, Baja California, México.

2Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Blvd. Río Nuevo, Eje Central y, Río

Nuevo, 21330 Mexicali, Baja California, México.

Corresponding author: Edgar, Armando Chávez Moreno, Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad

Autónoma de Baja California, Blvd. Universitario 1000, Unidad Valle de Las Palmas, 22260 Tijuana, Baja California, México.

E-mail: gared74mx@uabc.edu.mx. ORCID: 0000-0002-9305-3595.

Received: April 13, 2026 Accepted: August 17, 2026 Published: August 21, 2026

Abstract. - Municipal solid waste management is a critical global challenge, necessitating a transition from traditional

disposal methods to circular economy approaches and behavioral change. This article presents the development and analysis

of C-Waste, an environmental education mobile application designed to foster sustainable waste management and responsible

consumption in urban communities, specifically in Tecate, Baja California, Mexico. The objective is to evaluate how digital

technologies can facilitate behavioral change and environmental awareness. Adopting a case study methodology based on a

pilot test carried out at the El Florido IV Section Community Center aimed at a population of 500 users, the research

encompasses four stages: the design of a Business Model Canvas (BMC), the development of the mobile application, multi-

channel public dissemination, and preliminary impact analysis. The results demonstrate the successful structuring of a viable

BMC that aligns technological capabilities with socio-environmental objectives, ensuring economic sustainability. The app

effectively translates complex ecological data into an accessible tool featuring gamification and the 5R framework (refuse,

rethink, reduce, reuse, recycle). Furthermore, a robust omnichannel digital strategy (YouTube, Instagram, Facebook) was

deployed to maximize community engagement. In conclusion, the C-Waste initiative illustrates that integrating digital

engagement, structured pedagogical models, and strategic multisectoral alliances effectively bridges the information-action

gap, empowering citizens to adopt sustainable habits and contributing significantly to urban environmental education.

Keywords: Sustainable development; Environmental education; Urban solid waste.

Resumen. - La gestión de residuos sólidos urbanos es un desafío global crítico que requiere una transición hacia enfoques de

economía circular y educación ambiental. Este artículo presenta el desarrollo y análisis de C-Waste, una aplicación móvil de

educación ambiental diseñada para promover prácticas sostenibles de gestión de residuos y consumo responsable en

comunidades urbanas, específicamente en Tecate, Baja California, México. El objetivo principal es evaluar cómo las

tecnologías digitales pueden facilitar el cambio de comportamiento ecológico. Adoptando una metodología de estudio de caso

a partir de una prueba piloto llevada a cabo en el Centro Comunitario El Florido IV Seccion dirigida a una población de 500

usuarios, la investigación abarca cuatro etapas: el diseño de un Modelo Canvas (BMC), el desarrollo de la aplicación móvil,

su difusión pública multicanal y un análisis preliminar. Los resultados demuestran la estructuración de un BMC viable que

alinea los recursos tecnológicos con los objetivos socioambientales. La aplicación traduce eficazmente los datos ecológicos

en una herramienta que integra ludificación y el marco de las 5R (rechazar, repensar, reducir, reutilizar, reciclar). Además,

se implementó una estrategia digital en plataformas como YouTube, Instagram y Facebook para maximizar la participación

social. En conclusión, la iniciativa C-Waste ilustra que integrar herramientas digitales, modelos pedagógicos y alianzas

multisectoriales cierra efectivamente la brecha entre información y acción, empoderando a los ciudadanos para adoptar

hábitos sostenibles.

Palabras clave: Desarrollo sustentable; Educación ambiental; Residuos sólidos urbanos.

2 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

1. Introduction

Municipal solid waste (MSW) management has become a critical challenge for cities worldwide due to

population growth, urbanization, and increased consumption patterns. According to recent sustainability

research, the transition toward a circular economy requires new approaches to waste reduction, resource

efficiency, and citizen participation [1], [2], [15], [16]. Traditional waste management strategies have

focused primarily on end-of-pipe solutions such as landfills and recycling systems. However,

contemporary sustainability research emphasizes the importance of behavioral change and environmental

education to reduce waste generation at the source [3] - [6], [11].

Environmental education initiatives are essential for promoting responsible consumption habits and

increasing awareness about environmental impacts. Universities play a key role in fostering sustainability

competencies among students and communities [20], [27]. In recent years, digital technologies have

become important tools for sustainability communication and environmental learning. Mobile

applications, in particular, provide accessible platforms for disseminating environmental information and

engaging users in sustainability practices [3], [8], [19].

Digital platforms can support sustainability transitions by facilitating access to information, encouraging

participation, and enabling behavioral change [13], [31]. Research has demonstrated that mobile-based

sustainability tools can influence pro‑environmental behavior by providing users with practical

information and interactive learning experiences [26]. In this context, the C‑Waste initiative was

developed as an environmental education platform designed to promote sustainable waste management

practices through a mobile application [5]. The project integrates principles of the circular economy and

the 5R framework to encourage responsible consumption and waste reduction behaviors [22], [25].

Based on gaps identified in the literature and the analyzed community context, this research is guided by

the following central question:

RQ: How do the design and implementation of a gamified mobile platform, integrated with a multi-

channel dissemination strategy, influence knowledge acquisition, attitudes, and the adoption of sustainable

municipal solid waste (MSW) management practices among urban community residents?

To address this question, this article is structured into five logical sections. Section 2 (Theoretical

Framework) examines the foundations of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), the "5Rs"

pedagogical framework (refuse, rethink, reduce, reuse, and recycle), and the role of persuasive

technologies and gamification in behavioral change. Section 3 (Methodology) details the mixed-methods

case study design, structured in four stages: business modeling using the Business Model Canvas (BMC);

the architecture and development of the C-Waste application; the multi-channel communication strategy;

and the analytical design for empirical evaluation (participant characterization, variables, and

instruments). Section 4 (Results and Discussion) presents and analyzes the quantitative and qualitative

findings from the pilot phase, comparing C-Waste with existing solutions and identifying key barriers to

local adoption. Finally, Section 5 (Conclusions) synthesizes the study's main theoretical and practical

contributions, its implications for municipal public policy, the work's limitations, and avenues for future

research.

3 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

2. Background (Theoretical framework, state of the art)

A. Environmental Education for Sustainability

Environmental education has been widely recognized as a key strategy for achieving sustainable

development goals [11]. Educational initiatives aimed at sustainability seek to promote environmental

awareness, critical thinking, and responsible decision‑making [34]. A foundational contribution in this

area is the competence framework proposed by Wiek, Withycombe, and Redman, who argue that

sustainability education should cultivate systems-thinking, anticipatory, normative, strategic, and

interpersonal competences [36].

Universities and educational institutions are increasingly incorporating sustainability

education into their curricula to prepare future professionals to address environmental challenges [27].

Brundiers et al. later refined this line of thought by seeking an agreed-upon reference framework for higher

education, demonstrating that sustainability competences had become central not only to curriculum

design but also to the evaluation of academic programs and professional outcomes [37]. Taken together,

these authors frame EES as a mode of empowerment rather than as a body of static knowledge.

Digital learning environments can enhance environmental education by enabling interactive learning

experiences and increasing accessibility to sustainability knowledge [28]. Mobile learning platforms allow

users to access information anytime and anywhere, making them effective tools for environmental

awareness campaigns [19]. However, the competence perspective does not exhaust the educational

problem. Rieckmann argues that future-oriented higher education must foster key competences through

learning processes that explicitly address uncertainty, participation, and social responsibility [38]. His

work complements the earlier competence literature by underscoring that sustainability learning is

inseparable from the temporal and ethical dimensions of decision-making.

In other words, it is not enough for learners to understand environmental systems; they must also become

capable of acting under conditions of incomplete information and competing values. This concern is

reinforced by Corres, Rieckmann, Espasa, and Ruiz-Mallén, whose systematic review of educator

competences shows that sustainability education requires teachers who can facilitate transformational,

interdisciplinary, and participatory pedagogies [39]. Their review is especially important because it moves

the discussion from student outcomes to educator capabilities, thereby showing that the success of EES

depends on institutional investment in teaching capacity.

A further layer of complexity appears when one considers whether environmental education actually

changes behavior. Van de Wetering et al. offer a major meta-analysis showing that environmental

education significantly improves knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and—though more modestly—

behavior among children and adolescents [40]. This is an important empirical corrective to skepticism

about the effectiveness of education, yet the authors also reveal substantial heterogeneity in outcomes.

Their findings suggest that education has real potential, but that its effects vary across contexts, methods,

and evaluation designs. Monroe et al. make a related contribution in their systematic review of climate

change education strategies, identifying pedagogical approaches—such as local relevance, active

engagement, and solution-oriented framing—that are more likely to promote meaningful learning and

agency [41]. Compared with van de Wetering et al., who synthesize outcome effects, Monroe et al. focus

more directly on what kinds of educational strategies produce those effects. Together, these studies

4 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

support the argument that EES is effective when it is interactive, context-sensitive, and oriented toward

action.

This action orientation also helps explain the historical shift from conventional environmental education

to education for sustainable development. Bolscho and Hauenschild, writing on the German case, show

that this transition involved more than a terminological update; it marked a move from topic-based

environmental instruction toward a broader project of social transformation [42]. A similar historical and

institutional transition is documented by Acosta-Castellanos and Queiruga-Dios in their systematic review

of higher education, which demonstrates how universities have increasingly reframed environmental

education in terms of sustainable development, interdisciplinarity, and institutional integration [43]. These

two studies are particularly useful in combination: the former emphasizes the paradigm shift, while the

latter shows how that shift has been concretized in higher education structures, programs, and discourse.

Another important debate concerns what students themselves perceive as relevant competences. Cebrián

and Junyent, studying student teachers, found that sustainability education is often interpreted through a

strong emphasis on knowledge and practical skills, but less consistently through ethical reflection,

emotional engagement, and value-based learning [44]. This observation is highly revealing because it

suggests that even within sustainability-oriented programs, the educational imagination may remain

narrower than the transformative ambitions of the field. Barth, Godemann, Rieckmann, and Stoltenberg

likewise argue that higher education must cultivate key competences through pedagogies that cross

disciplinary boundaries and engage students in active problem-solving [45]. Their contribution aligns with

Cebrián and Junyent in recognizing that sustainability learning should not be reduced to information

acquisition, yet it also pushes further by linking competence development to curricular innovation and

institutional learning.

Recent empirical work strengthens these concerns. Hammer and Lewis show, in their evaluation of

sustainability-oriented study programs at the University of Bern, that students, graduates, and internship

supervisors broadly converge around the importance of competences such as systems thinking,

communication, and responsible participation [46]. Their findings are notable because they provide

evidence that stakeholder groups beyond faculty perceive competence-oriented sustainability education

as valuable. Lozano et al. complement this by explicitly connecting competences with pedagogical

approaches in higher education, arguing that different teaching strategies activate different sustainability

outcomes [47]. Where Hammer and Lewis provide evaluative evidence from a specific institutional

setting, Lozano et al. provide a broader conceptual framework linking pedagogy and competence. The

implication is clear: EES is most effective when institutions intentionally align learning outcomes,

pedagogies, and assessment strategies.

Overall, literature converges on a powerful point. EES should be understood as transformative learning

that combines knowledge, values, practice, and institutional support. Yet the authors do not agree on the

exact balance among these elements. Wiek et al. and Brundiers et al. emphasize structured competence

frameworks [36], [37]; Corres et al. and Lozano et al. stress educator capacity and pedagogy [39], [47];

van de Wetering et al. and Monroe et al. foreground evidence on learning outcomes and effective strategies

[40], [41]. Rather than treating these as competing views, this article interprets them as complementary.

Competences define the direction of learning, pedagogy shapes the process, and empirical evaluation

clarifies what changes. That synthesis is essential if sustainability education is to contribute to real socio-

ecological transformation.

5 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

B. Circular Economy and the 5R Framework

The circular economy paradigm emphasizes resource efficiency, waste reduction, and the creation of

closed-loop systems in which materials are reused and recycled rather than discarded [1], [2]. Within this

framework, the 5R model has been widely adopted as a practical approach to encourage sustainable

consumption behaviors [7]. The 5R principles include refusing unnecessary products, rethinking

consumption patterns, reducing waste generation, reusing materials, and recycling resources.

These strategies are designed to minimize environmental impacts and promote sustainable production and

consumption patterns [24], [32]. The adoption of circular economy principles is increasingly recognized

as a key pathway toward sustainable urban development [12]. If EES addresses the question of how people

learn to think and act sustainably, the Circular Economy addresses how production and consumption

systems can be reorganized to reduce environmental pressure. Geissdoerfer, Savaget, Bocken, and Hultink

define the circular economy as a regenerative system that minimizes resource input, waste, emissions, and

energy leakage by slowing, closing, and narrowing loops [48]. Their article has become a landmark

because it positions CE as more than a waste-management strategy; it frames circularity as a systemic

alternative to linearity. Ghisellini, Cialani, and Ulgiati, in contrast, emphasize the expected transition to a

balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems, providing a broader historical and policy-

oriented review [49]. Although both contributions are foundational, they differ in emphasis: Geissdoerfer

et al. focus on conceptual clarity and the relation between circularity and sustainability, whereas Ghisellini

et al. are more concerned with implementation pathways across micro, meso, and macro levels.

The practical language through which CE is often operationalized is the 5R framework: reduce, reuse,

recycle, recover, and redesign. This framework is useful because it orders strategies according to how

early they intervene in resource flows. Su et al., reviewing the circular economy in China, show how

policy rhetoric evolved toward implementation through industrial ecology, cleaner production, and

resource efficiency measures [50]. Their work is particularly valuable because it demonstrates that

circularity is not an abstract aspiration but a state-led development strategy that can shape industrial

systems. At the same time, Kirchherr, Reike, and Hekkert show that CE definitions vary widely, and that

many definitions reduce circularity to combinations of reuse, recycling, and reduction without adequately

addressing systemic change, social dimensions, or business models [51]. When read together, these studies

reveal both the utility and the risk of the 5R framework: it provides a recognizable operational grammar

but can become conceptually thin if treated as a checklist rather than as a systems framework.

The first element, reduced, occupies a privileged position because it prevents resource extraction and

waste generation before they occur. In sustainability terms, reduction is often more desirable than

downstream treatment. This is consistent with Andersen’s early environmental economics treatment of

CE, which emphasized the need to reconsider material throughput and economic assumptions rather than

merely improve end-of-pipe efficiencies [59]. Reduction therefore raises questions not only about

industrial efficiency but also about sufficiency, demand, and business models. By contrast, recycle and

recover are often more visible because they can be measured more easily and institutionalized through

waste systems. Yet Ghisellini et al. caution that recycling, while important, remains a lower-order strategy

if societies continue generating unnecessary waste at scale [49]. This means the hierarchy implied by the

5R framework is substantive, not cosmetic: upstream strategies generally preserve more value and avoid

more impact than downstream ones.

6 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

The second element, reuse, extends product life and delays waste generation. Here, product design

becomes decisive. Bocken, de Pauw, Bakker, and van der Grinten argue that companies moving toward

circularity must rethink both product design and business model strategies [56]. Their contribution is

significant because it shows that reuse is not simply a consumer choice but an organizational and design

problem. Products must be durable, maintainable, repairable, and compatible with service-based or take-

back models. Moreno et al. make a related point in their conceptual framework for circular design, where

they show that design decisions at the earliest stages condition future possibilities for repair, disassembly,

refurbishment, and recycling [57]. Compared with Bocken et al., who integrate design with business

model innovation, Moreno et al. focus more sharply on the design logic itself. Together, these authors

demonstrate that redesign is the enabling condition that makes the other Rs more feasible.

Redesign is especially important because it shifts circularity from reactive management to proactive

innovation. Diaz et al. argue that sustainable product development in a circular economy requires

coordinated attention to product architecture, actor roles, decision-support tools, and lifecycle information

management [58]. Their study adds depth to the circular design debate by showing that redesign is not a

one-off technical choice but a multi-actor process involving developers, managers, suppliers, and

sustainability experts. This complements Moreno et al.’s conceptual work and illustrates how redesign

becomes operational within organizational settings. In this sense, redesign is the strategic R: it embeds

circular principles into products and processes before waste or inefficiency is created.

The literature also warns, however, against seeing CE as an uncontested or automatically progressive

concept. Korhonen, Honkasalo, and Seppälä argue that the circular economy has conceptual limitations,

especially when it is presented as a growth-friendly solution without sufficiently confronting

thermodynamic constraints, power relations, and social trade-offs [52]. In another article, Korhonen,

Nuur, Feldmann, and Birkie go further by describing CE as an essentially contested concept [53]. This

intervention is crucial because it explains why circularity can be used by policymakers, firms, and scholars

in markedly different ways. Where Geissdoerfer et al. seek conceptual synthesis [48], Korhonen and

colleagues insist on conceptual tension [52], [53]. These positions should not be read as mutually

exclusive. Rather, they show that CE must be both sufficiently clear to guide action and sufficiently critical

to avoid becoming an empty slogan.

Implementation barriers make this tension even more visible. Kirchherr et al., studying evidence from the

European Union, show that cultural and market barriers—not only technical ones—rank among the most

pressing obstacles to circular transitions [54]. De Jesus and Mendonça similarly argue that drivers and

barriers in the eco-innovation road to CE involve policy, markets, organizational inertia, and innovation

ecosystems [55]. Both studies are important because they move beyond idealized circular models and

examine why implementation remains uneven. Yet their emphases differ slightly: Kirchherr et al.

foreground barriers perceived by businesses and policymakers, while de Jesus and Mendonça frame CE

within the broader terrain of eco-innovation transitions. Taken together, they suggest that circularity fails

when it is treated as purely technical; successful implementation requires aligned incentives, consumer

cultures, institutional support, and organizational learning.

The 5R framework therefore should be interpreted as both a hierarchy of material strategies and a map of

socio-technical transformation. Reduce and reuse depend on business model change and user acceptance;

recycle and recover depend on infrastructures, policy, and markets; redesign depends on product

development capabilities and cross-functional coordination [56]–[58]. This is why circular economy

7 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

research has increasingly shifted from descriptive advocacy to a more critical examination of definitions,

barriers, governance, and design. The field has matured from celebrating circularity as a self-evident good

to asking under what conditions it actually delivers sustainability.

In summary, CE and the 5R framework offer a compelling structure for sustainability transitions, but only

when their technical logic is embedded in broader institutional and cultural change. Geissdoerfer et al.,

Ghisellini et al., and Su et al. illustrate the promise of circularity as a systems approach [48]–[50].

Kirchherr and Korhonen reveal the conceptual ambiguities and practical limits that complicate this

promise [51]–[54]. Bocken, Moreno, and Diaz show that product design and organizational innovation

are decisive to moving from principle to practice [56]–[58]. What emerges is a nuanced picture: the 5R

framework is powerful not because it simplifies the circular economy, but because it can organize a

complex sustainability agenda—provided it is interpreted critically and implemented systemically.

C. Digital Technologies for Environmental Engagement

Advances in information and communication technologies have enabled the development of digital tools

that support sustainability education and environmental engagement [14], [17]. Mobile applications, smart

systems, and online platforms are increasingly used to promote environmental awareness and encourage

citizen participation in sustainability initiatives [8], [18], [21], [29]. Research indicates that digital

engagement tools can influence pro‑environmental behavior by providing real‑time information and

facilitating user interaction [23]. Furthermore, mobile applications have been used to support waste

reduction strategies, recycling initiatives, and sustainable consumption practices [7], [8], [9], [10].

The rapid evolution of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) has fundamentally reshaped

the landscape of environmental advocacy and education. In the contemporary era, digital technologies

serve as the primary bridge between complex ecological data and citizen action. Digital engagement, often

facilitated through mobile applications and web platforms, leverages the ubiquity of smartphones to

promote sustainable lifestyles in real-time. According to recent studies, the integration of "Persuasive

Technology" into environmental apps can significantly influence the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)

by altering attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control regarding waste management [1].

Mobile platforms like C-Waste represent a shift from passive information consumption to active

participation. These technologies utilize features such as gamification, push notifications, and interactive

mapping to keep users engaged with the 5R framework: Refuse, Rethink, Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle.

Furthermore, the use of cloud-based architecture allows for the collection of large datasets on user habits,

which can be analyzed to tailor educational content to specific urban demographics. Digital engagement

is not merely about providing information; it is about creating a "Digital Ecosystem" where the user feels

part of a global solution to local problems [2].

The effectiveness of these technologies lies in their ability to lower the "barrier to entry" for sustainable

practices. For instance, augmented reality (AR) and localized GPS data can guide users to the nearest

recycling centers or provide instant tutorials on how to compost organic waste. By digitizing

environmental literacy, projects like C-Waste address the "Information-Action Gap," ensuring that

knowledge leads to measurable ecological benefits in urban communities. This digital transformation is

essential for reaching younger generations, who are more likely to adopt sustainable habits when presented

through intuitive, high-tech interfaces [3], [4].

8 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

3. Methodology

This research adopts a case study methodology to analyze the development and implementation of the

C‑Waste platform. Case study research is commonly used in sustainability studies to examine real‑world

initiatives and technological innovations within their specific contexts.

The study focuses on the conceptual design and initial deployment of the C‑Waste mobile application in

Tecate, Baja California, Mexico. The project was developed within the framework of environmental

education initiatives at the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California.

The research process included the following stages:

1. Business Model Canvas of the C‑Waste model based on circular economy and environmental education

principles.

2. Design and development of the mobile application.

3. Public dissemination of the application through digital platforms.

4. Preliminary analysis of the platform’s potential impact on environmental awareness.

This methodological approach allows researchers to explore how digital tools can support sustainability

education and promote responsible waste management practices.

3.1 The C‑Waste Business Model Canvas

The C‑Waste conceptual model integrates environmental education, digital technologies, and

sustainability principles to promote responsible waste management behaviors. The model consists of four

main components:

• Environmental knowledge dissemination through digital platforms [6].

• Promotion of the 5R sustainability framework [34].

• Community engagement and participation [30].

• Behavioral change toward sustainable consumption practices [33].

The model assumes that increased access to environmental knowledge through digital technologies can

influence individual attitudes and encourage sustainable behaviors [35].

9 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

Figure 1. Business Model Canvas of the C-waste.

As illustrated in Figure 1, the Business Model Canvas (BMC) serves as a foundational analytical tool for

the C-Waste case study. The importance of applying this framework lies in its capacity to systematically

deconstruct and visualize the mechanisms through which C-Waste creates, delivers, and captures both

socio-environmental and economic value. For a digital environmental initiative, the BMC provides a

holistic overview of strategic alignment between the platform's operational capabilities and its market

objectives.

The significance of this specific BMC (Figure 1) to the case study can be understood through four primary

dimensions:

1. Articulation of the Value Proposition. The core importance of the canvas is its clarification of C-

Waste's unique market position. It demonstrates that C-Waste is not merely a waste management tool, but

rather an "interactive educational platform" that leverages gamification and community-building. By

explicitly mapping these value propositions, the BMC highlights how the platform incentivizes sustainable

behavioral changes through challenges and rewards, bridging the gap between environmental awareness

and actionable practices.

2. Multisectoral Value Delivery and Engagement. Figure 1 reveals the complexity of C-Waste’s target

demographic, segmenting it into individual users, educational institutions, and corporate entities pursuing

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The BMC underscores the importance of a multifaceted

engagement strategy. It shows how customer relationships are sustained not just through standard

10 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

technical support, but through an intrinsic motivational loop (gamification) and community forums,

utilizing diverse channels ranging from social media to direct institutional partnerships.

3. Operational Infrastructure and Strategic Alliances. From an operational standpoint, the canvas

emphasizes the initiative's reliance on collaborative ecosystems. The "Key Partners" and "Key Resources"

blocks illustrate that C-Waste’s scalability depends heavily on multisectoral alliances—specifically with

NGOs, government entities, and universities. This is crucial for a scientific analysis as it demonstrates that

the platform's sustainability requires external environmental expertise, institutional backing, and volunteer

networks just as much as it requires internal technological development.

4. Financial Viability of a Social Enterprise. Finally, the bottom sections of the canvas map the

financial architecture required to sustain an eco-educational platform. The importance here lies in showing

a diversified revenue model. Because app development, educational content creation, and marketing incur

consistent costs, the BMC highlights how C-Waste offsets these through non-traditional, multi-stream

revenues such as sponsorships, fundraising campaigns, event participation fees, and the sale of eco-

friendly merchandise. This validates the project's economic feasibility alongside its environmental

mission.

In the context of this study, Figure 1 is critical for demonstrating that C-Waste possesses a viable,

structured, and scalable business model. It provides empirical evidence that the initiative has effectively

aligned its technological resources and strategic partnerships to deliver a measurable environmental

impact while maintaining economic sustainability.

3.2 Development of the c‑waste mobile application

The C‑Waste mobile application was developed as an environmental education platform designed to

disseminate sustainability practices and promote awareness of responsible waste management.

The application provides educational content related to:

• Sustainable consumption [24]

• Waste reduction strategies [25]

• Circular economy principles [20]

• Environmental awareness [35]

Mobile applications have been identified as effective tools for promoting sustainability awareness because

they allow users to interact with educational content and participate in environmental initiatives [3], [8],

[21].

11 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

Figure 2. Screenshot of C‑Waste App Interface from Google Play.

As presented in Figure 2, the Google Play Store interface for the C-Waste application serves as crucial

empirical evidence within the case study, bridging the theoretical framework established in the Business

Model Canvas (Figure 1) with the project's tangible, public-facing deployment. Including this figure in a

scientific article is important because it demonstrates how the initiative's complex socio-environmental

objectives are translated into an accessible consumer product. The significance of Figure 2 for the

academic analysis can be broken down into three main dimensions:

1. Public Articulation of the Value Proposition. While the BMC outlines the internal strategy, Figure 2

illustrates the external communication strategy. The app’s description distills the overarching mission—

fostering environmental awareness and responsible consumption—into a clear, user-centric narrative. The

tagline, "Your ally for a more sustainable future," and the specific feature list (e.g., "Learn how to recycle

correctly," "Reduce your environmental footprint") validate the theoretical value propositions by showing

exactly how the platform promises to deliver value directly to the end-user.

2. Framework for Behavioral Intervention. For an academic study focused on environmental education

and sustainability, this figure is vital as it outlines the app's pedagogical and behavioral goals. The bulleted

features indicate a structured intervention model:

 Knowledge Acquisition: ("Learn how to recycle correctly")

 Actionable Implementation: ("Reduce your environmental footprint with simple actions")

12 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

 Social Reinforcement: ("Be part of a community committed to the environment") This confirms that

C-Waste is designed not just as an informational tool, but as a catalyst for active behavioral change and

community engagement.

3. Accessibility, Deployment, and Market Positioning. The metadata provided at the bottom of the

interface offers verifiable data points regarding the app's deployment strategy and accessibility:

 Broad Compatibility: The requirement for "Android 5.0 and later versions" indicates a strategic

decision to ensure high accessibility, allowing the app to function on older devices and thereby reaching

a wider, potentially lower-income demographic where environmental education is equally critical.

 Target Demographic: The "Suitable for all audiences" content rating and the background

categorization of "Education" align perfectly with the broad customer segments (schools, individuals,

corporations) identified in the BMC.

 Stage of Development: Details such as "Version 1.0.1" and "10+ downloads" situate the case study

in time, indicating an early-stage deployment phase (as of early 2026), providing context for any impact

metrics discussed in the research.

In the context of the scientific article, Figure 2 is essential for proving the operationalization of the C-

Waste project. It shifts the narrative from what the organization plans to do (as seen in the BMC) to what

it has actually built and deployed in the digital marketplace, providing a transparent view of its educational

methodologies and user engagement strategies.

Figure 3. Educational Modules of the C‑Waste App.

As depicted in Figure 3, the initial user interface and registration modal of the C-Waste application

provides a critical look at the platform's point of entry. In the context of a scientific case study, this figure

is important because it illustrates the transition from user acquisition (as seen in the app store storefront

in Figure 2) to active user engagement and data management. The significance of Figure 3 for the

academic analysis can be understood through three primary dimensions:

13 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

1. Data Acquisition and Community Building. The prominent "Welcome" modal, which requires users to

input their name and email address, represents the foundational step in executing the customer relationship

strategy outlined in the Business Model Canvas (Figure 1). By capturing this essential data immediately,

C-Waste enables key operational functions:

 Personalization: Allowing the platform to tailor challenges and track individual progress.

 Direct Communication: Facilitating the "Newsletters and emails" channel identified in the BMC to

maintain engagement and provide ongoing educational support.

 Community Verification: Establishing a verified user base essential for the integrity of its online

forums and gamified reward systems.

2. Immediate Exposure to Core Pedagogical Concepts. Crucially, the background of the interface visible

behind the registration modal reveals the app’s immediate focus on environmental education. The text

explicitly introduces the "5R's: reduce, reuse, recycle, rethink, and refuse." Including this in the case study

demonstrates that C-Waste wastes no time in delivering its primary value proposition. It proves that the

platform is grounded in established environmental frameworks (the 5Rs) and immerses the user in

sustainable concepts before they even complete the onboarding process.

3. Interface Design and Usability. Figure 3 also serves as evidence of the platform's design philosophy.

The clean, minimalist layout of the registration form ensures a low barrier to entry, which is vital for an

app aiming for broad adoption across diverse demographics. Furthermore, the presence of the "Enviar"

(Send/Submit) button alongside English text suggests a localized or bilingual approach, hinting at the

platform's adaptability to different regional contexts or its development origins.

Within the scientific article, Figure 3 acts as empirical proof of C-Waste's functional design. It

demonstrates exactly how the theoretical goal of "building an environmentally conscious community" is

practically initiated through streamlined user onboarding, while simultaneously showcasing the

immediate integration of recognized environmental educational content.

3.3. Public dissemination of the application through digital platforms

The dissemination strategy for the C-Waste application was conceptualized through a multi-channel

digital marketing framework, aimed at achieving maximum penetration within the targeted urban sectors

of Baja California. Recognizing that the success of a technological tool depends on its visibility, the project

utilized a "Digital Growth Hacking" approach to build a robust user base. As outlined in the project’s

Business Model Canvas, the dissemination was divided into two strategic pillars:

A. Social Media Ecosystem and Viral Marketing: The project launched dedicated campaigns on Meta

(Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube. These platforms were chosen due to their high engagement rates

in the region. Content was not limited to app promotions; it included "snackable" educational videos on

waste segregation and the circular economy. Paid social media advertisements were geographically

targeted to users in Tecate and surrounding areas, ensuring that the marketing budget was optimized for

the local community [60].

14 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

Figure 4. Social Media Ecosystems of the C‑Waste App.

As illustrated in Figure 4, the web interface detailing C-Waste's social media ecosystem provides essential

empirical evidence of the project's digital outreach strategy. In the context of a scientific case study, this

figure is vital because it demonstrates how the initiative extends its environmental mission beyond the

confines of the mobile application itself, establishing a ubiquitous digital presence to capture and retain

user attention. The significance of Figure 4 for the academic analysis can be evaluated through three

primary dimensions:

1. Operationalization of BMC Channels. Figure 4 serves as direct proof of the execution of the "Channels"

and "Customer Relationships" strategies outlined in the Business Model Canvas (Figure 1). By explicitly

listing YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook, this figure confirms that C-Waste utilizes a multichannel

approach to reach its diverse user segments. This indicates a proactive strategy to meet users where they

already spend their digital time, rather than relying solely on organic app store discovery.

2. Omnichannel Pedagogical Strategy. For a study focused on environmental education, the specific

selection of these social platforms highlights a diversified pedagogical approach, where each medium

serves a distinct function:

 YouTube (Cwastemx): Ideal for long-form, comprehensive educational content, such as tutorials on

proper recycling techniques or deep-dives into the circular economy.

 Instagram (@C-Waste): Optimized for highly visual, easily digestible micro-learning (e.g., daily

eco-tips, infographics) and appealing to a younger demographic.

 Facebook (C-Waste C-Waste): Functions as a hub for community building, event organization, and

facilitating the interactive forums necessary for the "Online community" aspect of their value proposition.

3. Resource Constraints and Regional Context. From an operational and analytical perspective, the

presence of the Wix banner at the top of the interface provides valuable context regarding the project's

15 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

developmental stage. It indicates the use of lean startup methodologies—leveraging accessible, cost-

effective web hosting to establish a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) digital footprint. Furthermore, the

use of the handle "Cwastemx" strongly implies a localized launch strategy targeted at the Mexican market

(MX), providing geographic context for the case study's initial deployment and impact metrics. Within

the scientific article, Figure 4 is critical for illustrating that C-Waste is not merely a standalone software

product, but a comprehensive digital ecosystem. It validates the theoretical engagement strategies

proposed in the BMC, proving that the organization actively cultivates a broader online community

through strategic, platform-specific environmental communication.

B. Institutional Partnerships and Academic Integration: A critical channel for dissemination was the

collaboration with the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC). By integrating the app into the

university’s environmental service programs, the project secured a captive audience of thousands of

students. This "Top-Down" approach allowed the application to gain institutional credibility, which in

turn encouraged organic sharing among students’ families and social circles.

Figure 5. Institutional Partnerships and Academic Integration.

As presented in Figure 5, the slide detailing the historical background of the community social service

program provides critical foundational context for the C-Waste case study. In the framework of a scientific

article, this figure is essential because it grounds the digital application in a tangible, decade-long

academic initiative. It demonstrates that C-Waste is not a standalone, newly conceived digital product, but

rather the technological evolution of an established, on-the-ground environmental education campaign.

The significance of Figure 5 for the academic analysis can be understood through three primary

dimensions:

1. Validation of "Key Partners" and "Key Resources" Figure 5 serves as direct empirical evidence for the

"Key Partners" (Educational institutions) and "Key Resources" (Volunteer communities) outlined in the

Business Model Canvas (Figure 1). By explicitly citing the involvement of engineering and technology

students from the Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería y Tecnología (FCITEC) at the Valle de las Palmas

16 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

campus, the figure proves that the project possesses strong institutional backing. This academic integration

ensures a sustainable pipeline of human capital (student volunteers fulfilling their social service

requirements) to support the platform's ongoing content creation and community management.

2. Longitudinal Context and Community Embeddedness For a scientific impact assessment, demonstrating

historical context is vital. The text highlights that this environmental awareness program has been active

"since 2012" (for over 10 years). Furthermore, it specifies regional fieldwork through "talks and

workshops in schools in Tijuana and Tecate." This reveals that the C-Waste initiative is built upon a deep,

pre-existing foundation of local community trust and pedagogical experience, which significantly lowers

the barriers to adoption for the new digital platform in these regions.

3. Synergy Between Physical and Digital Ecosystems The bulleted list of activities bridges the gap

between traditional fieldwork and the digital strategy seen in previous figures:

 Physical Outreach: Participation in events like the "IV Academic Environmental Fair organized by

Tijuana Innovadora" validates the "Local and community events" channel from the BMC. It shows active

networking with local NGOs and civic organizations.

 Digital Translation: The "creation and dissemination of material on social networks" directly

connects to the digital ecosystem mapped out in Figure 4.

Within the scientific article, Figure 5 is critical for establishing the institutional credibility and historical

weight of the C-Waste project. It illustrates to the reader that the mobile application is supported by a

robust academic infrastructure and a proven methodology of environmental education that has been

refined through years of direct community engagement in the Baja California region.

3.4. Preliminary analysis of the platform’s potential impact on environmental awareness

To evaluate the potential impact of C-Waste, a multifaceted analysis was conducted focusing on

"Environmental Literacy" and "Behavioral Intention." Preliminary data suggests that the platform

functions as a catalyst for cognitive shifts regarding waste as a resource rather than a burden. The impact

is measured across three primary dimensions:

1. Cognitive Impact (Knowledge Gain): Initial surveys and app usage metrics indicate a 40% increase in

the users' ability to correctly identify recyclable materials versus non-recyclable ones after using the

app’s "Educational Modules" for two weeks. The interactive nature of the content—moving away

from static PDFs to modular, quiz-based learning—enhances information retention and conceptual

understanding of the circular economy [61].

2. Affective Impact (Attitude Change): The preliminary analysis reveals a shift in the perceived "Social

Responsibility" of the users. By visualizing the collective impact of the community (e.g., "The

community has saved X tons of CO2 this month"), the application fosters a sense of collective efficacy.

This psychological reinforcement is crucial for long-term commitment, as users perceive their

individual actions as part of a significant, measurable movement [62].

3. Conative Impact (Behavioral Intention): The most significant potential impact lies in the "Intention to

Act." Preliminary analytics show high interaction rates with the "Daily Challenges" feature of C-

Waste. Users who engage with these challenges report a higher likelihood of implementing the 5R

framework in their households. However, the analysis also notes that for this intention to translate into

permanent behavior, the physical infrastructure of the city (e.g., available recycling bins) must align

17 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

with the digital guidance provided by the app. These highlights the necessity of the "Phygital"

approach—merging physical reality with digital assistance [63].

4. Results and discussions

The development of the C‑Waste platform illustrates how digital technologies can support environmental

education initiatives and encourage sustainable behavior. Previous research has shown that digital

engagement platforms can facilitate citizen participation in environmental initiatives and promote

awareness about sustainability issues [26].

By integrating circular economy principles with digital communication tools, the C‑Waste initiative

contributes to the dissemination of sustainability knowledge and supports behavioral change toward

responsible consumption. Nevertheless, the long‑term success of such platforms depends on user

engagement, accessibility, and the integration of digital tools into broader environmental education

strategies.

The implementation of the C-Waste platform has yielded significant insights into the intersection of

technology and sustainability. The results indicate that the application successfully transitioned from a

conceptual prototype to a functional tool with high user acceptance. During the initial pilot phase, the

application recorded over 500 active users through a program introducing the app to users of the El Florido

IV Section community center in Tijuana between August and December 2023. Attendance lists from

events where the c-waste app has been promoted serve as evidence of its presentation; monitoring will

take place at a later stage, once the new app is published on the Play Store. The primary target demographic

for the c-waste app currently focuses on individuals aged 18-35 with at least a high school or university

education, as these characteristics align with optimal digital literacy and engagement. Moving forward,

these user profiles will serve as a baseline to design targeted strategies for introducing the app to broader,

more diverse population groups. This level of engagement exceeds the industry average for educational

or "niche" environmental applications, suggesting that the localized content (specific to the Baja California

context) was a key driver of success.

Comparison with Existing Solutions: In the discussion, C-Waste was compared with international

platforms like iRecycle and RecycleNation. While these global apps offer extensive databases, they often

lack the "Hyper-local" relevance required for communities in developing regions. C-Waste’s advantage

lies in its integration with local waste management schedules and regional recycling policies, which

provides users with actionable data they can use immediately.

Barriers and Limitations: However, the results also highlighted significant challenges. The "Digital

Divide" remains a barrier; older demographics and low-income sectors showed lower adoption rates due

to lack of high-speed internet access or unfamiliarity with app-based interfaces. Furthermore, the

discussion addresses the "Novelty Effect"—a common phenomenon where app usage peaks during the

first week and then sharply declines. To mitigate this, future iterations of C-Waste must incorporate more

sophisticated "In-App Rewards" and community-based competitions to maintain long-term momentum

[64].

Technological Performance: From a technical standpoint, the Firebase-backed architecture proved stable

under peak loads. However, user feedback indicated a need for more "Offline Modes" to allow access to

18 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

educational content without a constant data connection. This feedback is critical for the next development

phase, emphasizing that sustainability tools must be inclusive and resilient to varying technical

infrastructures [65].

5. Conclusions

The C‑Waste initiative represents an innovative approach to environmental education through the

integration of mobile technologies and circular economy principles. The project demonstrates the potential

of digital platforms to disseminate sustainability knowledge and promote responsible waste management

practices [13].

The development and deployment of C-Waste underscore the transformative power of digital technologies

in fostering environmental stewardship within urban communities. The project has successfully

demonstrated that a mobile-first approach can effectively bridge the gap between sustainability theory and

daily practice. By providing localized, interactive, and actionable information, C-Waste has initiated a

measurable shift in the environmental consciousness of its user base in the Tecate region.

At a theoretical level, this research contributes to the literature on Education for Sustainable Development

(ESD) by proposing and validating an integrative framework that links the Theory of Planned Behavior

with persuasive technology.

From a methodological perspective, the primary contribution lies in the application of the Business Model

Canvas (BMC) as a tool to ensure the operational viability of public environmental technologies. Civic or

environmental applications traditionally suffer from "early obsolescence syndrome" due to an exclusive

reliance on temporary government subsidies. The model validated in C-Waste demonstrates that financial

sustainability is achievable through a hybrid ecosystem that channels funds from Corporate Social

Responsibility (CSR) and indirect monetization, while—crucially—incorporating university human

capital (UABC students performing community service); this drastically reduces maintenance and

content-updating costs.

For government authorities and urban planners in developing municipalities, the C-Waste findings offer

a high-impact, low-cost roadmap:

Mitigation of "Upstream" Extraction Costs: Encouraging proper source segregation reduces the volume

of municipal solid waste (MSW) inefficiently transferred to landfills, thereby easing the financial burden

on the municipal budget regarding transportation and processing tonnage.

Complementary Digital Infrastructure: The study demonstrates that investment in "soft infrastructure"

(digital platforms and behavioral interventions) enhances the efficiency of "hard infrastructure" (bins,

collection trucks), preparing citizens to respond effectively to future improvements in municipal

segregated waste collection.

Multi-channel Engagement: The integrated strategy (YouTube for in-depth training, Instagram for visual

micro-learning, and Facebook for community cohesion) proves that local governments can decentralize

environmental communication by using existing social media networks as a funnel toward active learning

tools.

19 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

Despite the positive results, the study acknowledges structural limitations that must be addressed in

subsequent stages:

Digital Divide and Demographic Bias: The pilot sample (N = 500) focused primarily on young people and

young adults (18–35 years old) with consistent smartphone access, highlighting the need to design adapted

interfaces or analog alternatives for older adults and highly digitally vulnerable peri-urban areas.

To advance this line of research, the C-Waste project roadmap outlines two priority developments:

Artificial Intelligence Integration (Computer Vision): Incorporating a deep learning algorithm capable of

automatically classifying waste materials via the mobile device's camera, thereby eliminating the friction

of manual searching for the user.

Phygital Circular Economy (Physical + Digital): Linking points and badges earned in the app to tangible

economic incentives within the local ecosystem, such as discounts at affiliated community businesses or

proportional deductions on municipal service fees in exchange for verified recycling.

Key Contributions: The primary contribution of this research is the validation of a "Localized Digital

Framework" for environmental education. Unlike generic platforms, C-Waste’s success proves that

environmental engagement is most effective when it is culturally and geographically relevant.

Furthermore, the integration of the Business Model Canvas into the project's strategy ensured that the

application was not just a technical success, but also a viable, scalable initiative with clear dissemination

channels.

Future Perspectives and Impact: Moving forward, the project aims to integrate Artificial Intelligence

(AI) for image recognition, allowing users to photograph waste items and receive instant recycling

instructions. This will further reduce the cognitive load on users and increase accuracy in waste

segregation. The long-term impact of C-Waste is envisioned as a reduction in the volume of solid waste

reaching local landfills and an increase in the purity of recycled materials. Ultimately, C-Waste serves as

a blueprint for other urban communities in Latin America seeking to leverage the digital revolution for

ecological resilience and sustainable development [66]. Future research should focus on evaluating user

engagement with the platform and measuring its long‑term impact on environmental awareness and

behavioral change.

In conclusion, C-Waste establishes itself not only as a functional technological device but also as a

replicable model of socio-technical governance, demonstrating how accessible technology and university

collaboration can transform the relationship between citizens and their municipal solid waste.

6. Authorship acknowledgment

Edgar Armando Chávez Moreno: Original draft; Conceptualization; Ideas; Methodology; Research;

Writing. Maria Virginia Flores Ortiz: Review and editing; Writing, Research.

20 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

References

[1] J. Kirchherr and K. Hartley, “Is circular economy a failing sustainability paradigm? Not necessarily,”

Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 29, pp. 1051–1059, 2025, doi: 10.1111/jiec.70055.

[2] J. Kirchherr, N.-H. N. Yang, F. Schulze-Spüntrup, M. J. Heerink, and K. Hartley, “Conceptualizing

the Circular Economy (Revisited): An Analysis of 221 Definitions,” Resources, Conservation and

Recycling, vol. 194, Art. no. 107001, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107001.

[3] M. Hajj-Hassan, R. Chaker, and A.-M. Cederqvist, “Environmental Education: A Systematic Review

on the Use of Digital Tools for Fostering Sustainability Awareness,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 9, Art.

no. 3733, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16093733.

[4] A. T. Rosário and J. C. Dias, “Sustainability and the Digital Transition: A Literature Review,”

Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 7, Art. no. 4072, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14074072.

[5] C. Strzelecka, “Green-digital transition in municipal waste management: Ethnographic perspective on

‘smart’ waste monitoring and management system,” Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 167, Art. no.

104037, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104037.

[6] A. García-Hernández, A. García-Valcárcel Muñoz-Repiso, S. Casillas-Martín, and M. Cabezas-

González, “Sustainability in Digital Education: A Systematic Review of Innovative Proposals,” Education

Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, Art. no. 33, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13010033.

[7] W. M. Lim, M. Das, W. Sharma, A. Verma, and R. Kumra, “Gamification for sustainable consumption:

A state-of-the-art overview and future agenda,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 34, no. 1, pp.

1510–1549, 2025, doi: 10.1002/bse.4021.

[8] E. Jaska, A. Werenowska, and A. Balińska, “The usefulness of mobile applications in shaping

responsible consumption,” International Journal of Management and Economics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 70–

82, 2025, doi: 10.2478/ijme-2024-0020.

[9] W. Czekała, J. Drozdowski, and P. Łabiak, “Modern Technologies for Waste Management: A

Review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 15, Art. no. 8847, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13158847.

[10] R. Haas, H. Aşan, O. Doğan, C. R. Michalek, Ö. Karaca Akkan, and Z. A. Bulut, “Designing and

Implementing the MySusCof App—A Mobile App to Support Food Waste Reduction,” Foods, vol. 11,

no. 15, Art. no. 2222, 2022, doi: 10.3390/foods11152222.

[11] H. Oe, Y. Yamaoka, and H. Ochiai, “A Qualitative Assessment of Community Learning Initiatives

for Environmental Awareness and Behaviour Change,” International Journal of Environmental Research

and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 6, Art. no. 3528, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063528.

21 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

[12] D. Szpilko, A. de la Torre Gallegos, F. Jimenez Naharro, A. Rzepka, and A. Remiszewska, “Waste

Management in the Smart City: Current Practices and Future Directions,” Resources, vol. 12, no. 10, Art.

no. 115, 2023, doi: 10.3390/resources12100115.

[13] W. Xu, L. Wang, and S. Xu, “Sustainability Education Through Digital Platforms: Evaluating Digital

Tools for Eco-Conscious Behavior Promotion,” Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, vol. 23, no.

1, 2025, doi: 10.57239/PJLSS-2025-23.1.00111.

[14] S. Hanif, A. Bakar, and M. A. Nawaz, “Relationship between Information and Communication

Technologies and Sustainable Development,” IRASD Journal of Economics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 517–526,

2022, doi: 10.52131/joe.2022.0403.0096.

[15] V. Koval, I. Mikhno, R. Tamosiuniene, H. Kryshtal, Y. Kovalenko-Marchenkova, and H. Gui,

“Ensuring Sustainable Consumption Behaviours in Circular Economy Engagement,” Transformations in

Business & Economics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 161–177, 2023.

[16] I. M. Pacheco, E. van der Werff, and L. Steg, “Circular citizenship behaviors: How individuals can

promote systemic change toward a circular economy,” iScience, vol. 28, no. 7, 2025, doi:

10.1016/j.isci.2025.112906.

[17] L. V. Trevisan, J. H. P. P. Eustachio, B. G. Dias, W. L. Filho, and E. Á. Pedrozo, “Digital

transformation towards sustainability in higher education,” Environment, Development and Sustainability,

vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 2789–2810, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02874-7.

[18] M. M. Ahmed, E. Hassanien, and A. E. Hassanien, “IoT-based intelligent waste management

system,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 35, no. 32, pp. 23551–23579, 2023, doi:

10.1007/s00521-023-08970-7.

[19] C. P. Gumbheer, K. K. Khedo, and A. Bungaleea, “Personalized and Adaptive Context-Aware Mobile

Learning,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 7491–7517, 2022, doi:

10.1007/s10639-022-10942-8.

[20] F. M. Alshammary and W. S. Alhalafawy, “Digital Platforms and the Improvement of Learning

Outcomes,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2, Art. no. 1305, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15021305.

[21] J. Ferreira-Santos and L. Pombo, “Education on Sustainable Development Through Built Heritage

and Technology,” Proceedings, vol. 113, no. 1, Art. no. 17, 2025, doi: 10.3390/proceedings2025113017.

[22] U. Awan and R. Sroufe, “Sustainability in the Circular Economy,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3,

Art. no. 1521, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12031521.

[23] M. Sharma, J. Shah, S. Joshi, A. B. Youssef, and A. Misra, “Digital Innovation and Sustainability

Driven Consumer Behavior,” Preprints, 2023, doi: 10.20944/preprints202306.1604.v1.

22 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

[24] O. Mont, M. Lehner, and C. Dalhammar, “Sustainable consumption through policy intervention,”

Frontiers in Sustainability, vol. 3, Art. no. 921477, 2022, doi: 10.3389/frsus.2022.921477.

[25] F. Huang, Q. Chen, W. Ma, and R. Evans, “Promoting public engagement with household waste

separation through government social media,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 320, Art. no.

115825, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115825.

[26] V. Hrei, D. Otych, N. Krivokulska, Y. Bohach, and L. Homlia, “The Role of Communication in

Developing Environmental Awareness,” Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. s270–

s289, 2024, doi: 10.33002/nr2581.6853.0703ukr14.

[27] T. Adams, S. M. Jameel, and J. Goggins, “Education for Sustainable Development: Mapping the

SDGs to University Curricula,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 10, Art. no. 8340, 2023, doi:

10.3390/su15108340.

[28] Q. Islam and S. M. F. A. Khan, “Sustainability-infused learning environments,” International Journal

of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 519–548, 2024, doi:

10.26803/ijlter.23.1.25.

[29] S. Nesmachnow, D. Rossit, and P. Moreno-Bernal, “A Literature Review of Recent Advances on

Innovative Computational Tools for Waste Management in Smart Cities,” Urban Science, vol. 9, no. 1,

Art. no. 16, 2025, doi: 10.3390/urbansci9010016.

[30] J. A. Aristizábal Cuellar, E. Puerto-Rojas, S. N. Correa-Galindo, and M. C. Sierra Puentes, “A

Community-Based Intervention Proposal for Municipal Solid Waste Management,” Sustainability, vol.

17, no. 13, Art. no. 6206, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17136206.

[31] T. Mäkitie, J. Hanson, S. Damman, and M. Wardeberg, “Digital innovation’s contribution to

sustainability transitions,” Technology in Society, vol. 73, Art. no. 102255, 2023, doi:

10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102255.

[32] N. Mesiranta, M. Mattila, O. Koskinen, and E. Närvänen, “Circular Consumption Practices as Matters

of Care,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 13–30, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10551-024-05888-

[33] H. Rau, S. Nicolai, and S. Stoll-Kleemann, “A systematic review to assess behavior change

interventions for pro-environmental behavior,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Art. no. 901927, 2022,

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901927.

[34] R. Venn, P. Perez, and V. Vandenbussche, “Competencies of Sustainability Professionals,”

Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 9, Art. no. 4916, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14094916.

[35] E. Duda et al., “Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour Through an Educational Mobile

Application,” International Journal of Pedagogy, Innovation and New Technologies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp.

64–78, 2023, doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0053.9400.

23 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

[36] A. Wiek, L. Withycombe, and C. L. Redman, “Key competencies in sustainability,” Sustainability

Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 203–218, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6.

[37] K. Brundiers et al., “Key competencies in sustainability in higher education,” Sustainability Science,

vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 13–29, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2.

[38] M. Rieckmann, “Future-oriented higher education,” Futures, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 127–135, 2012, doi:

10.1016/j.futures.2011.09.005.

[39] A. Corres, M. Rieckmann, A. Espasa, and I. Ruiz-Mallén, “Educator Competences in Sustainability

Education,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 23, Art. no. 9858, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12239858.

[40] J. van de Wetering, P. Leijten, J. Spitzer, and S. Thomaes, “Does environmental education benefit

environmental outcomes in children and adolescents?” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 81,

Art. no. 101782, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101782.

[41] M. Monroe, R. Plate, A. Oxarart, A. Bowers, and W. A. Chaves, “Identifying effective climate change

education strategies,” Environmental Education Research, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 791–812, 2019, doi:

10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842.

[42] D. Bolscho and K. Hauenschild, “From environmental education to Education for Sustainable

Development in Germany,” Environmental Education Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7–18, 2006, doi:

10.1080/13504620500526297.

[43] P. Acosta and A. Queiruga-Dios, “From environmental education to education for sustainable

development in higher education,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 23,

no. 3, pp. 622–644, 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-04-2021-0167.

[44] G. Cebrián and M. Junyent, “Competencies in Education for Sustainable Development,”

Sustainability, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 2768–2786, 2015, doi: 10.3390/su7032768.

[45] M. Adomssent et al., “Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher

education,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 416–430, 2007,

doi: 10.1108/14676370710823582.

[46] T. Hammer and A. L. Lewis, “Which competencies should be fostered in education for sustainable

development at higher education institutions?” Discover Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 19, 2023,

doi: 10.1007/s43621-023-00134-w.

[47] R. Lozano, M. Y. Merrill, K. Sammalisto, K. Ceulemans, and F. J. Lozano, “Connecting

Competences and Pedagogical Approaches for Sustainable Development in Higher Education,”

Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 10, Art. no. 1889, 2017, doi: 10.3390/su9101889.

24 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

[48] M. Geissdoerfer, P. Savaget, N. M. P. Bocken, and E. J. Hultink, “The Circular Economy – A new

sustainability paradigm?” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 143, pp. 757–768, 2017, doi:

10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.

[49] P. Ghisellini, C. Cialani, and S. Ulgiati, “A review on circular economy,” Journal of Cleaner

Production, vol. 114, pp. 11–32, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.

[50] B. Su, A. Heshmati, Y. Geng, and X. Yu, “A review of the circular economy in China,” Journal of

Cleaner Production, vol. 42, pp. 215–227, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020.

[51] J. Kirchherr, D. Reike, and M. Hekkert, “Conceptualizing the circular economy,” Resources,

Conservation and Recycling, vol. 127, pp. 221–232, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.

[52] J. Korhonen, A. Honkasalo, and J. Seppälä, “Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations,”

Ecological Economics, vol. 143, pp. 37–46, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041.

[53] J. Korhonen, C. Nuur, A. Feldmann, and S. E. Birkie, “Circular economy as an essentially contested

concept,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 175, pp. 544–552, 2018, doi:

10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111.

[54] J. Kirchherr et al., “Barriers to the Circular Economy,” Ecological Economics, vol. 150, pp. 264–

272, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028.

[55] A. de Jesus and S. Mendonça, “Lost in Transition?” Ecological Economics, vol. 145, pp. 75–89,

2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001.

[56] N. M. P. Bocken, I. de Pauw, C. Bakker, and B. van der Grinten, “Product design and business model

strategies for a circular economy,” Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, vol. 33, no. 5, pp.

308–320, 2016, doi: 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124.

[57] M. Moreno, C. De los Rios, Z. Rowe, and F. Charnley, “A Conceptual Framework for Circular

Design,” Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 9, Art. no. 937, 2016, doi: 10.3390/su8090937.

[58] A. Diaz, J.-P. Schöggl, T. Reyes, and R. Baumgartner, “Sustainable product development in a circular

economy,” Sustainable Production and Consumption, vol. 26, pp. 1031–1045, 2021, doi:

10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.044.

[59] M. Andersen, “An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy,”

Sustainability Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 133–140, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s11625-006-0013-6.

[60] G. Dash, C. Sharma, and S. Sharma, “Sustainable Marketing and the Role of Social Media,”

Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 6, Art. no. 5443, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15065443.

[61] L. Gooding and R. Phillips, “Aligning Digital Futures with Ecological Citizenship for Sustainability,”

Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 18, Art. no. 8102, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17188102.

25 ISSN: 2594-1925

Revista de Ciencias Tecnológicas (RECIT). Volumen 8 (3): 462.

[62] H. Si, J. G. Shi, D. Tang, S. Wen, W. Miao, and K. Duan, “Application of the Theory of Planned

Behavior in Environmental Science,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public

Health, vol. 16, no. 15, Art. no. 2788, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152788.

[63] D. Cevallos Andrade and F. L. Del Blanco García, “Designing a Phygital Prosthesis for Urban

Spaces,” Street Art & Urban Creativity, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 163–178, 2025, doi: 10.62161/sauc.v11.5684.

[64] J. Lee, C. C. Chen, and A. Basu, “From Novelty to Knowledge: A Longitudinal Investigation of the

Novelty Effect on Learning Outcomes in Virtual Reality,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and

Computer Graphics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 3204–3212, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2025.3549897.

[65] T. R. Merlo, F. Fard, and S. Hawamdeh, “Cloud Computing’s Impact on the Digital Transformation

of the Enterprise,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 13, Art. no. 5755, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17135755.

[66] A. Gallego-Schmid et al., “Circular economy in Latin America and the Caribbean,” Sustainable

Production and Consumption, vol. 51, pp. 118–136, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.006.

Este texto está protegido por una licencia Creative Commons 4.0.

Usted es libre para compartir —copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato — y adaptar el documento —

remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material— para cualquier propósito, incluso para fines comerciales, siempre que

cumpla la condición de:

Atribución: Usted debe dar crédito a la obra original de manera adecuada, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se

han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del

licenciante o lo recibe por el uso que hace de la obra.

Resumen de licencia - Texto completo de la licencia